<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LB Technology Services Blog &#187; technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Firedfox</title>
		<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/09/29/firedfox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/09/29/firedfox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lorenb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/?p=924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started using Firefox as my web browser when it was still called Phoenix around version 0.5/0.6. Previously I was using Netscape Communicator which had become a bloated mess. 
At the time Firefox was a breath of fresh air. It was just a browser without all the mail, IRC client, web page designer that came [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started using <a href="http://www.mozilla.com">Firefox</a> as my web browser when it was still called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Mozilla_Firefox">Phoenix</a> around version 0.5/0.6. Previously I was using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape_Communicator">Netscape Communicator</a> which had become a bloated mess. </p>
<p>At the time Firefox was a breath of fresh air. It was just a browser without all the mail, IRC client, web page designer that came with Netscape. It was very fast. It had cool features like tabs. Linux was well supported.</p>
<p>Over time this has changed and I find Firefox getting slower and less relevant. The developers seem to be under the impression that Firefox users are their personal army to push web standards. I only used Firefox because it&#8217;s a tool not because of any social movement.</p>
<p>Things like how Firefox handles SSL, specifically self-signed certificates are a pain compared to other browsers. I hate it when my browser crashes and I lose all open tabs/windows. Things seem to get worse every new Firefox release.</p>
<p>In the past I didn&#8217;t have much of a choice, I had to put up with this as under Linux there wasn&#8217;t anything else available. That however has changed with <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Google Chrome</a>. It&#8217;s much better than Firefox ever was and I&#8217;m now using it full time.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.gnome.org/">GNOME</a> developers have also dropped Firefox/Gecko and are moving to <a href="http://webkit.org/">WebKit</a>. This is the same engine Google Chrome uses as well. In the very near future, I except Firefox will no longer be the default browser in most Linux distributions.</p>
<p>On Windows, I also expect Firefox usage will drop. <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/">Microsoft</a> has made Internet Explorer v8 much better and somewhere in Redmond they are working on v9, v10, etc. As people upgrade to Windows 7, willl they keep using Firefox? I suspect IE will start be &#8220;good enough&#8221; for most people. </p>
<p>On the Mac, most people are going to use the default and that is <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/">Safari</a>.</p>
<p>When you look at the mobile scene it&#8217;s much the same. Microsoft is going to use IE in Windows Mobile devices. Google has another WebKit based browser for Android. Apple has Safari on the iPhone. Nokia will use WebKit as they now own <a herf="http://qt.nokia.com/products">QT</a>. </p>
<p>Notice how the industry seems to be standardizing on WebKit? The odd man out there is Firefox.  Who is going to use <a  href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/fennec/1.0a1/releasenotes/">Fennec</a> on their phone? </p>
<p>Another thing to consider is that the Mozilla Corporation gets most of their funding from Google. It&#8217;s not very hard to see that coming to an end too as Chrome becomes more important. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/09/29/firedfox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snow Leopard Install</title>
		<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-install/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-install/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lorenb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/?p=911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got my copy of Snow Leopard today. I&#8217;m in the process of installing it now on my Macbook. The install was straightforward as you can see from the screenshots below. I don&#8217;t expect any issues. 
Note there is an iPhone SDK available for Snow Leopard now (400MB download) at the iPhone Dev Center
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got my copy of <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/">Snow Leopard</a> today. I&#8217;m in the process of installing it now on my Macbook. The install was straightforward as you can see from the screenshots below. I don&#8217;t expect any issues. </p>
<p>Note there is an iPhone SDK available for Snow Leopard now (400MB download) at the <a href="http://developer.apple.com/iphone/index.action">iPhone Dev Center</a></p>

<a href='http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-install/osx-01/' title='osx-01'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/osx-01-150x150.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="osx-01" /></a>
<a href='http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-install/osx-02/' title='osx-02'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/osx-02-150x150.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="osx-02" /></a>
<a href='http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-install/osx-03/' title='osx-03'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/osx-03-150x150.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="osx-03" /></a>
<a href='http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-install/osx-04/' title='osx-04'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/osx-04-150x150.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="osx-04" /></a>
<a href='http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-install/osx-05/' title='osx-05'><img width="150" height="136" src="http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/osx-05-150x136.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="osx-05" /></a>
<a href='http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-install/osx-06/' title='osx-06'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/osx-06-150x150.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="osx-06" /></a>
<a href='http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-install/osx-07/' title='osx-07'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/osx-07-150x150.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="osx-07" /></a>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-install/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snow Leopard</title>
		<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/08/24/snow-leopard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/08/24/snow-leopard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lorenb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/?p=907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple is now taking pre-orders for OSX 10.6 a/k/a Snow Leopard. It will ship on Aug 28th. It cost me $35 CDN to upgrade from 10.5. If I had bought a mac recently it would have been $9.95.
Too bad Apple insists on phyical CDs. Would be nicer to just buy an ISO and I could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is now taking pre-orders for <a href="http://www.apple.com/ca/macosx/">OSX 10.6</a> a/k/a Snow Leopard. It will ship on Aug 28th. It cost me $35 CDN to upgrade from 10.5. If I had bought a mac recently it would have been $9.95.</p>
<p>Too bad Apple insists on phyical CDs. Would be nicer to just buy an ISO and I could burn my own DVD to upgrade. </p>
<p>Hopefully this upgrade won&#8217;t cause any issues with XCode/iPhone development. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/08/24/snow-leopard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rogers announces Android based phones</title>
		<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/05/07/rogers-announces-android-based-phones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/05/07/rogers-announces-android-based-phones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 13:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lorenb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/?p=792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rogers has announced they will be launching the first Android based phones in Canada. They will be from HTC.
See the press release
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rogers.com/">Rogers</a> has announced they will be launching the first Android based phones in Canada. They will be from <a href="http://www.htc.com/">HTC</a>.</p>
<p>See the <a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/May2009/07/c9320.html">press release</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/05/07/rogers-announces-android-based-phones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Android Market in Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/05/06/android-market-in-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/05/06/android-market-in-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 13:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lorenb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/?p=789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received an email from Google today saying that it&#8217;s now possible to publish free applications in Canada. Still no word on when paid apps will be allowed though.
In theory this should also mean that Rogers or someone is going to introduce Android based phones in Canada soon.
Hopefully soon we will be able to publish [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received an email from <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> today saying that it&#8217;s now possible to publish free applications in Canada. Still no word on when paid apps will be allowed though.</p>
<p>In theory this should also mean that <a href="http://www.rogers.com/">Rogers</a> or someone is going to introduce Android based phones in Canada soon.</p>
<p>Hopefully soon we will be able to publish our paid applications in the <a href="http://www.android.com/market/">Android Market</a> without having to setup a presence/merchant account in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/05/06/android-market-in-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Funtoo</title>
		<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/04/14/funtoo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/04/14/funtoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lorenb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trying to lookup some information about Gentoo Linux and I came across Funtoo. It seems this is a fork of Gentoo that is maintained by Daniel Robbins.
Daniel Robbins was the original creator of Gentoo Linux. He did a good job too but some users were not happy and kept pushing him to manage the project [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to lookup some information about <a href="http://www.gentoo.org/">Gentoo Linux</a> and I came across <a href="http://www.funtoo.org/">Funtoo</a>. It seems this is a fork of Gentoo that is maintained by <a href="http://blog.funtoo.org/">Daniel Robbins</a>.</p>
<p>Daniel Robbins was the original creator of Gentoo Linux. He did a good job too but some users were not happy and kept pushing him to manage the project more in the &#8220;community&#8221;. From there, you get the Gentoo council and lots of processes. Now things get masked longer, more software in overlays of varying quality, devs leave because of personality conflicts, and the <a href="http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2008/09/29/gentoo/">distro seems a bit stagnant</a>.</p>
<p>I was glad to see Daniel developing again. I emailed him to get more details about <a href="http://www.funtoo.org/">Funtoo</a>. Depending on what their goals are, I might switch over.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/04/14/funtoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackberry App World</title>
		<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/04/01/blackberry-app-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/04/01/blackberry-app-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lorenb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/?p=754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Research in Motion debuted the Blackberry App World. When first heard about there were not many details other than they planned a 80/20 split for revenue with developers (Apple, Google and Microsoft all are doing 70/30).
I see now that you need to use PayPal for consumer purchases and to accept payments. For anyone who&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today <a href="http://www.rim.com/">Research in Motion</a> debuted the <a href="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/appworld/">Blackberry App World</a>. When first heard about there were not many details other than they planned a 80/20 split for revenue with developers (Apple, Google and Microsoft all are doing 70/30).</p>
<p>I see now that you need to use <a href="http://www.paypal.com/">PayPal</a> for consumer purchases and to accept payments. For anyone who&#8217;s familar with PayPal that means even more fees to get your money. No wonder split is 80/20.</p>
<p>For development, it says appears to be <a href="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/developers/javaappdev/javadevenv.jsp">Java/Eclipse based</a>. Interestingly it seems the requirements say you need Windows. Perhaps their Eclipse plugins are not cross platform? </p>
<p>Also troubling is that you need a different JDE depending on which device(s) you want to target. From RIM:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>For example, an application built in BlackBerry JDE 4.1 runs on a BlackBerry smartphones running BlackBerry® Device Software 4.1 and later. It does not run on a BlackBerry smartphones running BlackBerry Device Software 4.0. Thus, when building applications, you should use a BlackBerry JDE version that matches the lowest version of BlackBerry Device Software you want to support.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>How do you know which versions are most common in the wild? Should you just assume everyone has the latest version?</p>
<p>Will their users actually buy apps too I wonder. Their biggest customer wins historically has been older people who wanted to get work email on the go. Not quite the kind of person who downloads apps on a whim. The <a href="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/developers/appworld/faq.jsp">pricing tiers</a> are okay, but interesting you can&#8217;t charge $0.99 for anything. It&#8217;s either free or $2.99 USD and goes up from there. </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t look very appealing to me as a developer. We will have to pass on this market. I&#8217;m really starting to think RIM is the modern day <a href="http://www.nortel.com/">Nortel</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/04/01/blackberry-app-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WebKit/Epiphany</title>
		<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/03/16/webkitepiphany/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/03/16/webkitepiphany/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lorenb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/?p=742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saw some good news this morning as WebKit GTK+ released v1.1.3 and along with it comes the first Epiphany release based on that code. 
I&#8217;ve been waiting for that for a while. I&#8217;ll have to try it out soon as I find that Epiphany/Gecko that I&#8217;m using now crashes a lot. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw some <a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/03/15/good-news-everyone/">good news</a> this morning as <a href="http://www.webkitgtk.org/">WebKit GTK+</a> released v1.1.3 and along with it comes the first <a href="http://projects.gnome.org/epiphany/">Epiphany</a> <a href="http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/epiphany/2.27/">release</a> based on that code. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been waiting for that for a while. I&#8217;ll have to try it out soon as I find that Epiphany/Gecko that I&#8217;m using now crashes a lot. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/03/16/webkitepiphany/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Marketplace</title>
		<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/03/11/windows-marketplace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/03/11/windows-marketplace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lorenb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/?p=732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saw over on Engadget that Microsoft has released details about the Windows Marketplace. They want to charge a $99 USD developer fee and another $99 USD for every application you submit.
Like Apple and Google, they are doing the 70/30 split with the developer for revenue.  They plan to have the marketplace open for business [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw over on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/">Engadget</a> that Microsoft has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/11/microsoft-unveils-windows-marketplace-fees-splits-hopes-and-d/">released details about the Windows Marketplace</a>. They want to charge a $99 USD developer fee and another $99 USD for every application you submit.</p>
<p>Like Apple and Google, they are doing the 70/30 split with the developer for revenue.  They plan to have the marketplace open for business in Q4 2009.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with the developer fee or the 70/30 split. However the $99/app charge just feels nickle &#038; dime. They don&#8217;t do this if you are developing for Windows desktop and/or server.</p>
<p>Windows users have a very bad history with piracy. I know more than a few <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/en-us/default.mspx">Windows Mobile</a> users who pirate/steal things like <a href="http://www.tomtom.com/">TomTom</a> and other 3rd party apps. I wonder how piracy will play out in the new marketplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/03/11/windows-marketplace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell BIOS</title>
		<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/03/04/dell-bios/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/03/04/dell-bios/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lorenb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/?p=712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I got a new notebook, a Dell Latitude E6400. Everything has been working great since I got it.
Once thing I wanted to do was update the BIOS to the latest vendor recommended version. Unlike my old D620, the E6400 BIOS is some kind of Windows/GUI thing and no longer fits on a DOS boot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I got a new notebook, a <a href="http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/01/21/dell-e6400/">Dell Latitude E6400</a>. Everything has been working great since I got it.</p>
<p>Once thing I wanted to do was update the BIOS to the latest <a href="http://support.dell.com/support/downloads/format.aspx?c=us&#038;l=en&#038;s=gen&#038;deviceid=15569&#038;libid=1&#038;releaseid=R211158&#038;vercnt=6&#038;formatcnt=0&#038;SystemID=LAT_E6400&#038;servicetag=&#038;os=WLH&#038;osl=en&#038;catid=-1&#038;impid=-1">vendor recommended version</a>. Unlike my old D620, the E6400 BIOS is some kind of Windows/GUI thing and no longer fits on a DOS boot disk (~2.88MB for BIOS update alone). Since I run <a href="http://www.gentoo.org/">Gentoo Linux</a> I have no way to update the BIOS.</p>
<p>It was suggested I try using something like <a href="http://www.nu2.nu/pebuilder/">BartPE</a> to boot into a Windows Preinstalled Environment. This failed as well because for some reason WinPE just hangs on boot. I&#8217;ve tried numerous things to workaround but nothing helped.</p>
<p>Asking <a href="http://www.dell.com/">Dell</a> about it, they explained the E6400 only supports Windows Vista. That&#8217;s just lame. They should be able to provide a Linux-compatible way to flash the BIOS or at the very least provide a WinPE boot disk to do it.</p>
<p><B>Update:</b>: Found a solution using FreeDOS/syslinux <a href="http://www.linuxinsight.com/how-to-flash-motherboard-bios-from-linux-no-dos-windows-no-floppy-drive.html#comment-1508">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2009/03/04/dell-bios/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->