<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future of LAT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2007/09/27/future-of-lat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2007/09/27/future-of-lat/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir Giszpenc</title>
		<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2007/09/27/future-of-lat/#comment-14718</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir Giszpenc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mmgsecurity.com/blogs/lorenb/2007/09/27/future-of-lat/#comment-14718</guid>
		<description>Monodevelop is VERY stable now at version 0.19 or 1.0 RC1 however you look at it.  I had trouble around the same period, but it turned out that some of the problems were my fault.  I had done some hacks to work around bugs in MonoDevelop and when they got fixed it really caused a problem.

Since you were not use Stetic version 0.15 from the start, you may have been bit by the same problem.

On another note, are you planning on continuing your support of OVAL?  They are coming out with version 5.4 discussing 6.0 and you don't have some 5.3 features like check_existence.

Cheerio!

Vlad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monodevelop is VERY stable now at version 0.19 or 1.0 RC1 however you look at it.  I had trouble around the same period, but it turned out that some of the problems were my fault.  I had done some hacks to work around bugs in MonoDevelop and when they got fixed it really caused a problem.</p>
<p>Since you were not use Stetic version 0.15 from the start, you may have been bit by the same problem.</p>
<p>On another note, are you planning on continuing your support of OVAL?  They are coming out with version 5.4 discussing 6.0 and you don&#8217;t have some 5.3 features like check_existence.</p>
<p>Cheerio!</p>
<p>Vlad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tugay Bilgin</title>
		<link>http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2007/09/27/future-of-lat/#comment-14285</link>
		<dc:creator>Tugay Bilgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mmgsecurity.com/blogs/lorenb/2007/09/27/future-of-lat/#comment-14285</guid>
		<description>Dear Bandiera,

thank you very much for your effords for creating the best ldap browser . I use your software as frontent for www.majen.net/smbldap  installation. however this post made me sad, you suffer from glade/mono, why dont you use Sharpdevelop and Windows.Forms? new mono releases almost completely support windows.forms gui library. Indeed it is much more easier and cross-platform..
Thank you very much again..


PS: A copy of this message has been sent to your e-mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Bandiera,</p>
<p>thank you very much for your effords for creating the best ldap browser . I use your software as frontent for <a href="http://www.majen.net/smbldap" rel="nofollow">http://www.majen.net/smbldap</a>  installation. however this post made me sad, you suffer from glade/mono, why dont you use Sharpdevelop and Windows.Forms? new mono releases almost completely support windows.forms gui library. Indeed it is much more easier and cross-platform..<br />
Thank you very much again..</p>
<p>PS: A copy of this message has been sent to your e-mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
